Hand.......cock - ain't thisthe truth?

EXCLUSIVE: How Health Secretary Matt Hancock misled Parliament about the Pfizer “vaccine”

This is Matthew Hancock announcing the “milestone” of an MHRA approved “vaccine” to the House of Commons yesterday. He reiterated his promise that “no vaccine will be used until its safety and effectiveness have been clearly established”. He added that the Pfizer formulation had been “subjected to the closest scrutiny of the MHRA” and been given “a clinical authorisation”. “This,” he stated baldly, “is a vaccine we can all believe in”. He finally bragged that “this is the first vaccine in the world to have achieved regulatory approval for use against Covid19”.

Mr Hancock misled the House. He further misled BBC News viewers earlier in the day, as he told them, “when this vaccine is rolled out, things will get better and we will all return to normality and the things we love”. He doesn’t know that – he cannot know that – and this is emphatically not what the MHRA Pfizer decision says.

I apologise now for having to resort to The Science Bit. It is however vital that this reckless little man is held to account. I am indebted to Slog reader Martin for digging out the somewhat obscure links on the MHRA website. The reality of what the regulator has decided blows Hancock’s claims out of the water.

You can get the full strength of such “approval” as has been given here.

These are the key facts about the Pfizer-Biontech product’s assessment under Reg174 at the MRHA:

This medicinal product does not have a UK marketing authorisation but has been given authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care

• It has no approval at all for people aged under 16

• The administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute severe febrile illness

No interaction or contraindication studies have been performed. In the absence of compatibility studies, this medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. Women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excl before vax

It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk

The effects of the vaccine on fertility are unknown

• Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting site https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/

The MHRA was given just five days to study the mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. “the closest scrutiny” Handcock?

Its safety and effectiveness have not been “clearly established”.

The Pfizer product has been given a temporary, narrow approval under the emergency Covid19 legal instruments so eagerly approved by our braindead MPs earlier this year.

Following Halfcock’s triumphalist Commons announcement earlier this week, not a peep has emanated from Her Majesty’s Opposition pointing out the Grand Canyon of gap between what the Health Secretary claimed, and what the MHRA has “approved”.

Further evidence of how the British Establishment now does what likes, free from fear of any resistance of a legal, judicial or constitutional nature.

Manflu Halfcock lied when he said this is a vaccine we can all believe in. He lied when he said it had full regulatory approval. He lied when he said safety and efficacy had been established. He lied when he assured the House that this was the beginning of a return to normal.

But then, I’d imagine over-exposure to a Prime Minister who lied about Newscorp phone hacking, Elm House paedophilia, Yeo taxi emissions, Skripal guilt and the EU Withdrawal Agreement might well have that effect on an over-promoted Secretary of State?

To finish with, I have spoken to the medical profession and they respond as follows:

Yes as far as I can see the above article is true and correct. The MHRA safety data will not be available until stage 4 clinical trial data starts to come in, this is only available when it's been used on over 100,000 people I think around that figure, so basically the 1st to be given it are the 4th stage guineapigs without their knowledge hmm all the side effect data will be reported to the Yellow card reporting system for all side effects in the UK, but bear in mind, the yellow card reporting system, is not spoken about by GPs, so unless you know about it you can't report to it if you're never told it exists some doctors do report side effects themselves to the Yellow card, but not the ones who receive gifts from pharma. So I would say all side effects reported are only the tip of the iceberg as people don't know where they are supposed to report side effects to ……

Mr Hancock is telling lies, as he is making false statements Why does the Yellow card reporting system exist if every vaccine or drug is safe and why, do we have inserts labels in all prescribed drugs packages warning of such side effects, they have given pharma immunity to prosecution, but can still get them on false advertising, we need the insert label from the vaccine pack, or the form people will have to sign before taking it as what is known as black boxguide classification from the MHRA, it's false advertising as you are being used as a guineapigs without our knowledge, the paper they will make us sign before taking it will inform you of this but they never give you time to read it properly, so then they can say well you where warn about the side effects but you still signed it so it's your own fault!!!!