top of page

5G Case dismissed

5G

My friend asked ChatGPT AI



The Government’s core premise that 5G is fundamentally the same as 4G, presented by the defendants, was accepted by Judge Stacey


Do you have information on this?


I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I do not have access to the latest news or legal proceedings in real-time. However, based on the information you provided, it seems that there was a legal case related to 5G technology and the UK government's stance on it, and Judge Stacey accepted the government's argument that 5G is fundamentally the same as 4G.


It's worth noting that this may be a specific case and doesn't necessarily reflect the overall scientific consensus on the differences and similarities between 4G and 5G technology. 5G is generally understood to have faster speeds, lower latency, and the ability to handle more devices at once compared to 4G. However, the implementation and effects of 5G technology may be a subject of ongoing debate and research.





My friend

5G is a phased array radar why would they favour such a weapon?

I'm sorry, but that statement is not entirely accurate. While 5G technology does use phased array antennas, it is not a radar or a weapon.


5G technology is a wireless communication system designed to provide faster data transfer speeds, lower latency, and the ability to handle more devices simultaneously compared to previous generations of cellular technology, such as 4G. Phased array antennas are used to direct the radio waves in a particular direction, allowing for more efficient and targeted communication between devices.


There is no evidence to suggest that 5G technology is being used as a weapon or that it has any harmful effects on human health. In fact, numerous studies and reviews have been conducted on the safety of 5G technology, and regulatory agencies around the world have set limits on the levels of radiofrequency radiation that can be emitted by 5G networks to ensure the safety of the public.


My friend Would you please give me some of this data? Certainly, here are some key findings and sources related to the safety of 5G technology: The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) released updated guidelines in 2020 on the maximum levels of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) from mobile networks, including 5G. These guidelines were based on a comprehensive review of the available scientific evidence and concluded that there is no evidence of adverse health effects from RF-EMF exposure below the recommended limits. [1] The World Health Organization (WHO) states that "To date, and after much research performed, no adverse health effect has been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies." However, they also note that "research on this topic is ongoing and WHO will continue to monitor and assess the health risks posed by exposure to radiofrequency fields." [2] The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that "The available scientific evidence to date does not support adverse health effects in humans due to exposures at or under the current limits for radiofrequency energy emitted by cell phones, towers, and antennas." [3] A systematic review published in the journal Environmental Research in 2020 looked at the available studies on the health effects of 5G technology and concluded that "the vast majority of studies reported no significant effects or evidence of harm." [4] A study published in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology in 2020 found that "RF-EMF exposure from 5G small cell towers at street level is minimal compared with exposure from other sources, including other mobile phone network technologies." [5] It's important to note that while these sources indicate that there is no evidence of harm from 5G technology, research on the topic is ongoing and more studies may be needed to fully understand any potential health effects. However, current evidence suggests that 5G technology is safe for use. [1] https://www.icnirp.org/en/publications/article/press-release-icnirp-publishes-new-guidelines-on-limits-of-exposure-to-high-frequency-electromagnetic-fields/ [2] https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/5g-mobile-networks-and-health [3] https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/cell-phone-safety [4] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512030740X [5] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-020-0239-0



81 views4 comments

Recent Posts

See All

He loves you

THIS IS THE TRUTH God loves you so much, He values and cherishes you like you are His only child. He doesn’t use your sins against you, He doesn’t judge you by your past. Unlike the enemy who calls yo

4 Comments


THEY SPENT BILLIONS ON PATENTS TO CONNECT THE PPL TO THEIR MACHINES ILLEGALLY.

Like

WHO HAS A SERPENT WRAPPED ROUND IT AS YOU SENT AGES AGO- CORRUPT ORG IS EVERY ORG BY WMD WEAPONS - MILITARY THESAURUS STATES WEAP;ONS CAN CAUSE NAUSEA, HEART ATTACKS. DISORDERS, DEATH, SO SAYING NO HARMS FROM WIRELESS TECH IS RUBBISH AND LIES- IN 2007 I PRINTED OFF MILITARY THESAURUS AND AFTER THIS THEY WIPED IT FROM THEIR MILITARY WEBSITE. ARMY DID NOT WANT IT BECAUSE THEY KNEW HOW BAD IT IS

Like

Caroline Stephens Seeking the truth



  • All Posts

  • Getting Started

  • Your Community


  • Caroline Stephens



    • Mar 13


    • 3 min read


5G Case dismissed 5G My friend asked ChatGPT AI The Government’s core premise that 5G is fundamentally the same as 4G, presented by the defendants, was accepted by Judge Stacey Do you have information on this? I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I do not have access to the latest news or legal proceedings in real-time. However, based on the information you provided, it seems that there was a legal case related to 5G technology and the UK government's stance on it, and Judge Stacey accepted the government's argument that 5G is fundamentally the same as 4G. It's worth noting that this…

Like
Replying to

THE4 DAMAGE FROM 1G IS BAD AND DEVELOPED TO 5G EVEN WORSE. IF IT WAS JUST THE SAME THERE WOULD BE NO POINT IN USING 5G- CORRUPT JUDGE STACEY

Like
bottom of page