Email addressed to Andrea Williams of Christian Concern
Dear Andrea
Following on from my earlier email I have been studying this case a little bit further.
Firstly you may be interested to read this statement about Archie's medical care as follows and they are not my words:
I’ll leave this with you to draw your own conclusion. Re: Archie This is from a professional in Medical field who shared this the other day “Obviously, not actually being there, anything I say is my own opinion based on my own knowledge. The fact that the young lad survived for two hours during discontinuation of treatment (drugs/medicinal) is just another example of the excellent care that has been provided in optimising his condition and keeping his body functioning. Not every single drug would be withdrawn at one time so the claims that he was "holding his own" is nothing more than the fact that he had enough residual drugs left in his system to sustain him through that period. Every medicine has what is known as a "half life" and is a measure used to guide dosage and titration. Some drugs have half lives of minutes, some have half lives of days. Most critical care type drugs have a lasting effect of several minutes to a couple of hours - hence the very specific titration levels in these settings that are adjusted constantly throughout the day.
The fact that he survived for a period of time has no bearing on his ability to survive independently. It's just the excellent support that he'd been given taking its time to work its way out of the system.
The cessation of all breathing activity immediately upon withdrawal of ventilatory support shows that all the clinical evidence was absolutely spot on and the correct decisions were indeed made.
Tragically, this poor lad was unable to, and would never have been able to, take a breath of his own, and as such would never independently sustain life.
I hope that helps explain some things. I know you'll all be fed up hearing my explanations by now. But I just feel its important to have an opinion from the other side of the coin.”
God bless him, the poor little soul 😢
Secondly, this is very noteworthy
And I quote:
In one passage, Mrs Justice Arbuthnot wrote of a visit to his bedside. “A lovely looking young boy, Archie seemed very peaceful despite the fact that he was connected to a number of tubes and medical equipment,” she wrote. “From what I know, the mother has hardly left his side in the eight weeks since his accident. I saw the bedside chair which converts into a single bed which she has been sleeping on.” She says that “the devotion of the family is extraordinary, their dignity obvious”, and concludes: “The visit has allowed me to hold Archie in my mind’s eye … He has become much more real to me.”
Andrea, I find her comment 'from what I know' to be rather strange (not actually a fact) together with 'he has become much more real to me.' All rather odd as presumably her visiting him in hospital is rather against the norm? Almost seems to be a showcase trial? I have taken the liberty to establish Mrs. Justice Arbuthnot's background and it makes for a good novel. According to Wiki: Towards the end of 2019, Arbuthnot, who had presided at several of Julian Assange's extradition hearings, stepped aside because of a "perception of bias", apparently linked to her husband.*
How interesting that the page is highlighting some sort of important marital link so let's take a look at her husband James' profile.
He comes from a very privileged bloodline as can be seen from this link:
Now taking a look at his Wiki page:
James Norwich Arbuthnot, Baron Arbuthnot of Edrom, PC (born 4 August 1952), is a British Conservative Party politician. He was Member of Parliament (MP) for Wanstead and Woodford from 1987 to 1997, and then MP for North East Hampshire from 1997 to 2015.
Arbuthnot was the parliamentary chairman of the Conservative FRIENDS OF ISRAEL.
Arbuthnot served as chairman of the Defence Select Committee from 2005 to 2014,[1] before being nominated as a life peer in the Dissolution Peerages List 2015 of August 2015.[2] On 16 January 2015, he publicly declared his ATHEISM. Created Baron Arbuthnot of Edrom, of Edrom in the County of Berwick, on 1 October 2015,[3] Lord Arbuthnot sits on the Conservative benches in the House
Of Lords.
He is a descendant of James V of Scotland and currently sits as a Privy Councillor, a role as you will be aware is one that drives legislation forward or not as the case may be.
Atheism, Israel, Privy Council and a background to Royalty is quite a mix I'm sure you'll agree especially considering that the 'Archie' case has potential implications for the whole of the UK population, whether they live or die. Atheism and a belief in Our Creator are at seeming odds with each other and as a Christian lawyer yourself I'm sure you understand where this is potentially heading.
This email dated 9th August and its contents has potential ramifications for every man, woman and child in the UK and beyond.
*Finally
The red flag re. Julian Assange led me to this article:
and I quote
Judge Emma Arbuthnot has refused to recuse herself from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s US extradition hearings. This is what “class justice” looks like.
Arbuthnot, Chief Magistrate and Senior District Judge for England and Wales, is flouting fundamental legal principles to ensure that she presides over a show trial against Assange, due to resume at Westminster Magistrates Court on February 25. If extradited, Assange faces charges under the Espionage Act, carrying a 175-year prison sentence. Further charges are pending, which could include the death penalty.
The “Guide to Judicial Conduct” in England and Wales, published in 2018, states that,
“Judicial independence is a cornerstone of our system of government in a democratic society and a safeguard of the freedom and rights of the citizen under the rule of law. The judiciary must be seen to be independent of the legislative and executive arms of government both as individuals and as a whole.”
Arbuthnot should have automatically recused herself on this basis.
Her husband, James Norwich Arbuthnot, is a Conservative member of the House of Lords. He is intimately connected with the British armed forces and security services, whose criminal operations were exposed by WikiLeaks.
So where does this leave us? It leads us to see in front of our very eyes that there are dark forces at work trying to undermine people's lives, their dignity and that plan to destroy all that Our Creator has provided for the majority of the men, women and children. How can there be justice in court when there are huge conflicts of interest.
As for the Julian Assange case, I know for a fact that Greece has stated the following only yesterday:
How it came to be known
When searching for info on the corruption scandal that broke in Greece involving the Predator spy software in cell phones of politicians, journalists etc (pointing to the Greek Intelligence Agency EYP), another EYP corruption case came into attention (CIA recruiting EYP officials for money) which was revealed long before by Wikileaks and Julian Assange. The Greek political party AKKEL (https://akkelparty.blogspot.com/p/akkel-profile.html) started the project to honor Julian Assange for this and other important revelations by promoting him to receive honorary Greek citizenship.
However, a combination of events might turn this project into a way to secure the exchange of Assange with British citizens kept in Russia and accused for working as mercenaries in Ukraine. Greek contacts who talked earlier to us, verified all these.
In short, the Greek AKKEL party president traveled to St. Petersburg a few months ago to participate in the celebrations for the victory against Nazism in WW-II. Among others he first presented the effort to give honorary citizenship to Assange. This was spread in some Russian circles and eventually was partly seen as a way to link it to the UK and US citizens held by russian forces. This was also seen by AKKEL as a "path" in Greece for bringing Assange to personally participate in the honorary naturalization procedure. The Russians obviously will not take the initiative from scratch to raise the possibility of exchanging Assange with UK prisoners. This publicity in the UK with the help of UK parliament members (from constituencies where the imprisoned British come) and family members of the imprisoned British citizens, will put the Russian leadership befire this option. If the Russians do not move, it will be a proof that they do not want Assange free, that is, they are the same as the US regime. There is no benefit for Russia if they dump Assange, but it will be seen positively if they raise the priority of this option and ask for the liberation of Assange and his dispatch to Greece (to participate in the naturalization procedure) in exchange for letting some UK citizens free and pledge that they will use their power to secure that no UK citizen will finally receive death sentence.
Andrea, I will be very interested to receive a response. I am in daily contact with Greece and it would be helpful if you could also assist here too.
Blessings
Caroline