Archie and his homelife - lovingly remembered....

Updated: Aug 16


Dear Andrea I have written to you four times over the past few days with no response. As a Christian, I am very interested to note your lack of apparent Christian ethics as per the misinformation being propagated regarding the Archie Battersbee case. May I respectfully ask if you have visited social media in the past couple of days? The following has been copied and pasted as follows: Christian Legal Centre and Christian Concern accused of using tragic case to whitewash their own anti-rights work A fundamentalist Christian Right organisation “preyed on” the family of tragic Archie Battersbee to whitewash its reputation for opposing equal rights and abortion while providing advice that was not fit for purpose, legal and medical experts have claimed. Archie died on Saturday when his life support was switched off, following a weeks-long battle between his family and medics who believed he was very likely brain-dead and had no prospect of recovery. The lawyers representing the Battersbee family came from the Christian Legal Centre, the legal arm of evangelical campaign group Christian Concern. The Christian Legal Centre says it works with clients “taking a stand for Jesus”; its recent cases include a magistrate who opposed gay couples adopting children and a couple who took legal action when their child was “confused” about another child wearing a dress. “The concerning thing is that the advice that the families may be given may not be accurate,” Dominic Wilkinson, professor of medical ethics at the University of Oxford, told openDemocracy. “I am not sure that the Christian Legal Centre will have given [Archie’s parents] a fair assessment of their chances.” Neena Modi, professor of neonatal medicine at Imperial College London, told openDemocracy that the Christian Legal Centre and Christian Concern “prey upon the most vulnerable”. The organisations have been approached for comment. “These third parties coming in are behaving appallingly, reprehensibly, unethically, and very damagingly,” she said. “They add to the grief and distress of families because they try and break down the trust that should exist between the medical team and the family – and which usually does exist.” Christian Concern has lobbied against abortion laws and LGBTQ+ rights. It is involved with “gay cure” events, and recently intensified calls to “protect children” from “the trans agenda”. Representation in court for Archie’s family included Pavel Stroilov, a consultant for the Christian Legal Centre, and Bruno Quitavalle, the former leader of the anti-abortion group ProLife Alliance. A judge in the case of Alfie Evans, a toddler whose life support was removed after this was deemed to be in his best interests, described Stroilov as a “fanatical and deluded young man” whose “malign hand” was “inconsistent with the real interests of the parents’ case”. In one instance, “false advice” provided by Stroilov to Alfie’s father Tom Evans said it would be lawful to remove Alfie from hospital. This “led to a confrontation” involving Evans, and police were called. Legal writer the Secret Barrister criticised Christian Legal Centre and other fundamentalist groups and media outlets in their 2020 book ‘Fake Law’, accusing them of “casting a fog over the facts and drilling into our deepest and most primal fears” while “pushing their own agendas”. Stroilov wrote a lengthy reply for the Christian Legal Centre arguing that the Secret Barrister’s comments were “an elitist rant” by “a left-wing pamphleteer writing for a left-wing audience”, and pointing to what he claimed were inaccuracies in the Secret Barrister’s summary of the cases of Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard. ‘False hope’ Commentators believe the CLC may also have been responsible for giving Archie Battersbee’s family false hope. The High Court was told that the family’s MP had written to the Royal London Hospital on behalf of Archie’s parents on 3 August, suggesting treatment abroad – despite there being “no detail as to what is being actually sought and where”. A written statement from a consultant paediatric neurologist said they were unaware of any treatment that could provide recovery to Archie’s condition. “It’s just awful that these false hopes are planted in families’ minds,” Modi told openDemocracy. “There should be better explanation of what irreversible brain injury means. Clearly, this MP has not got that kind of knowledge, and they should have.” As residents of Southend-on-Sea, the family’s MP is James Duddridge. openDemocracy has asked Duddridge to confirm if he wrote the letter. Southend West MP Anna Firth, meanwhile, urged Twitter followers to join her in donating to a GoFundMe page, tweeting: “The whole House is behind Archie and his family.” The fundraiser was set up by Southend resident Claire Howes, but administration was taken over by Archie’s sister-in-law who would withdraw funds for various expenses including legal fees. Nothing on the page ruled out any funds reaching Christian Concern or the Christian Legal Centre. Firth told openDemocracy of the Christian Legal Centre: “I know nothing about this organisation.” Criminal law barrister Michael Scott warned that cases like Archie’s are used by the Christian Legal Centre to whitewash their ideological and fundamentalist agenda. Scott told openDemocracy that, in his opinion: “It’s obvious they’ve got a huge agenda.” Scott believes the group are motivated “by political reasons”, adding: “I do very much get the feeling that they use these cases [of young children] for publicity and fundraising purposes.” Modi added: “[The Christian Legal Centre] need to be called out because they are doing huge damage. It preys upon [families like Archie’s] when they are absolutely at their most vulnerable.” She told openDemocracy that “the huge majority of these cases do not come anywhere near court” and that, while end of life decisions are “completely horrendous”, most parents feel they’ve been helped “to give their child a dignified, pain-free, calm, merciful end of life”. “It would be good to hear the voice of families who have had trust in the medical profession and who have witnessed the withdrawal of life support of a very loved child and have been grateful, appreciative and understanding of the way in which it's been done,” she said. “To hear their side of the story.” Now there is clearly something amiss with the Battersby case. You undoubtedly will be aware that you and your organisation were called out some time ago. Perhaps now is the time to set the matter straight otherwise you professing being qualified will not wash with the Christians in UK. As I conclude this email you undoubtedly have read the following: On the Naughty Step – the questionable ethics of the Christian Legal Centre Some people will not have come across the Christian Legal Centre (CLC) until the Alfie Evans case. Others will know something of their history. What the Alfie Evans case has done is cast light on what one might call the modus operandi of the CLC and some serious and pressing questions about the roles of those involved and, where they are actually lawyers, their professional ethics. I don’t propose to comment on the desperately sad Alfie Evans case itself. The poor child has now died. One cannot attach any blame for what has happened to the parents, either. Faced with a tragic and appalling situation, it is hardly surprising that they would turn to any people who seemed to be offering possible alternatives. Nor do I propose to comment on the political and religious views espoused by the CLC (and their ‘parent’, Christian Concern), save to note for anyone who has not encountered them that they are against the following: baking Gay cakes, being a gay couple staying in a B&B, abortion (in any circumstances), registrars having to conduct gay marriages, embryonic human stem cell research, being transexual (at any age), and for being able to wear visible religious jewellery in a job which required no visible jewellery. One suspects that if if they could find a legal argument for banning divorce or masturbation, no matter how poor the argument, the High Court would be being asked to rule. But, on to the practice questions. See..... https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2018/04/on-the-naughty-step-the-questionable-ethics-of-the-christian-legal-centre/ This link certainly opens up Pandora's Box. Who is funding you and why are you seemingly covering up the truth? Did you mention a happy homelife? Essex crime: Armed knifeman went to ex partner's home demanding his belongings - despite a ban on seeing her - Essex Live Blessings Caroline Stephens

Seeking the truth




Blessings

836 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

They are revealing the British slavemaster idea of what their world government is to be. The British slavemaster plan is a Police State exercising sovereignty over every person in the world. That is

1869 – Francis Galton authors a book in Britain – Hereditary Genius. Galton believed that intelligence, personality and abilities were traits inherited from parents. Absolutely wrong! Eugenics was a B